Dismissed

Vithal Harishchandra Porob., v. Narana Pandu Porobo Gauncar (Deceased) and 8 Ors.

Bombay HC17 Mar 2021MCA/167/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A claim to recover land allegedly included wrongfully in a court auction failed because title and possession were not established. The Court found no misreading of the property records or perversity in the concurrent findings and dismissed the second appeal without costs. The application to bring legal representatives on record was allowed.

What did the court decide?

Application to amend the cause title and bring the deceased appellant's legal representatives on record allowed; amendment directed forthwith.

Vithal Harishchandra Porob., Vs Narana Pandu Porobo… — Property and Title | Bombay HC (2021)

¶1

¶2

 Santosh

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA

¶4

SECOND APPEAL NO. 4 OF 2010

¶5

WITH

¶6

MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 167 OF 2017

¶7

1. Harichandra Vitola Porobo Also known as Horichondar Vitto Porobo, (deceased) And his wife,

¶8

 1(a) Vithal Harishchandra Porob
 son of deceased Appellants No.1 & 2.

¶9

 1(b) Mrs. Rukmini Vithal Parab,
 wife of

¶10

[2. Taramoti] (since deceased)

¶11

2.a. Sadashiv Raut Mulgaonkar
 Major, son-in-law of deceased R. 2

¶12

2.b. Satyawati Sadashiv Raut
 Major, daughter of deceased R. 2
 Both r/o Mulgao, Tambdo Road,

¶13

2.c. Anandi Anand Kolvekar

¶14

 Major, daughter of deceased R. 2

¶15

2.d. Mr. Anand Kolvekar, (Since deceased) Through Lrs

¶16

2.d.1. Trupti Anand Kolvekar Major, daughter of deceased R.2.d.

¶17

2.d.2. Pooja Anand Kolvekar Major, daughter of deceased R.2.d.

¶18

2.d.3. Pallavi Anand Kolvekar Major, daughter of deceased R.2.d.

¶19

2.d.4. Pranali Pranesh Parab

¶20

R/o. Molem, Goa.

¶21

¶22

3. Roulo Chandro Porobo e Sua Mulhar 4. Xantabai Porbina, Mairos, agricultorido Resident of Amona ... Appellants. (3 and 4 deleted by order Dated 24/7/1953) Versus

¶23

1. Narana Pandu Porobo Gauncar (deceased) 2. And his wife Parvoti (deceased) Heirs not brought on record by virtue of Order of the Trial Court dated 6/2/1985. 3. Ladco Pandu Porobo Gauncar (deceased) represented by his heirs Defendant no.4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 already on record and following other heirs: 3-a Bhima Shiva Sawant Sarvankar (deceased) daughter 3-b Shiva Jaidev Sawant Sarvankar (deceased) son-in-law 3-b-1 Jaimala alias Mali Jaidev Sawant (widow of deceased son) Jaidev Shiva Sawant and her children. 3-b-2 Vassudev Jaidev Sawant (minor) 3-b-3 Neeta Jaidev Sawant 3-b-4 Santosh Jaidev Sawant 3-b-5 Anita Jaidev Sawant

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Amiantit Fiberglass Industries India Pvt. Ltd. (in Liquidation), Thr. Official Liquidator., Vs Corportation Bank, Panaji.

Cezario F. D'Souza and Anr., Vs John Fernandes and 11 Ors.

Shri Cezario F. D'Souza and Anr., Vs Shri John Fernandes and 11 Ors.

Harichandra Vitola Porobo Aliso Known as Horichondar Vitto Porobo and 3 Ors., Vs Narana Pandu Porobo Gauncar (Deceased) and 8 Ors.

Ots Ltd., Rep. Herein by Its Director, Rajendra Kumar Gupta., Vs Pramod Damodar Borker and 2 Ors.

Kashinath Jairam Shetye Vs Deelip Raghavendra Shetye and 2 Ors.