In an income tax appeal, the High Court of Judicature at Bombay dismissed the appeal as withdrawn. The appellant stated that the underlying matter was settled under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act 2020.
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Digitally signed by MEERA MEERA MAHESH MAHESH JADHAV JADHAV Date:2021.11.15 14:52:32 +0530
401-itxa-1865-17.doc
1 / 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1865 OF 2017
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -2
….Appellant
V/s.
Mahindra Navistar Automotives Ltd …Respondent
----
Mr. Suresh Kumar for Appellant
Ms Hetal Laghave i/b Mr. Sanjiv M Shah for Respondent
----
CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM &
AMIT B. BORKAR, JJ
DATED : 15th NOVEMBER 2021
P.C. :
1 Mr. Suresh Kumar states since the matter has been settled under theDirect Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act 2020, appeal be dismissed as withdrawn.2 Appeal dismissed as withdrawn .3 Refund of court fees, if any, in accordance with rules.(AMIT B. BORKAR, J)
(K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)
Meera Jadhav
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -2
Mahindra Navistar Automotives Ltd
K.R. SHRIRAM
AMIT B. BORKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court