The High Court disposed of an income tax appeal held to be covered by a Supreme Court judgment, allowing the appeal without reasoning.
Appeal disposed in favour of appellant as covered by Supreme Court judgment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
921-itxa-1467-17.doc
MEERA MAHESH JADHAV
Digitally signed by 1 / 1 MEERA MAHESH JADHAV Date: 2021.11.24 11:16:51 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY +0530 ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1467 OF 2017
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-3
….Appellant
V/s.
M/s Bina Power Supply Co. Ltd. …Respondent
----
Mr. Sham Walve for Appellant
Mr. Madhur Agrawal i/b Mr. Atul K. Jasani for Respondent
----
CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM &
AMIT B. BORKAR, JJ
DATED : 23rd NOVEMBER 2021
P.C. :
1 Mr. Walve states that the substantial questions of law in this appealare already covered by a judgment of the Apex Court in Commissioner Vs.
Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd.1 and, therefore, appeal cannot survive.
2 Appeal disposed.(AMIT B. BORKAR, J)(K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)
1 (2018) 414 ITR 1 (SC)
Meera Jadhav
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Commissioner vs. Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd.Followed¶1
(2018) 414 ITR 1 (SC)
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-3
M/s Bina Power Supply Co. Ltd.
K. R. Shriram
Amit B. Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court