Muralidharan Rajasekharan v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Interim application for intervention in an anticipatory bail petition by the first informant (intervenor) was allowed. The applicant was directed to add the complainant as a respondent. The main bail application was listed for future hearing with interim relief continuing.
What did the court decide?
Interim application allowed; Applicant directed to add complainant as respondent no. 2; ABA served on complainant's advocate; Hearing listed for 18th March 2021; Interim relief continued.