In an interim application suspended bail during the pendency of an appeal, this single-judge Bench of the Bombay High Court held that since no substantive sentence had been awarded to the applicants, the question of suspension or bail did not arise. The application was disposed of in the negative.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
15a. IA 671-21 IN APEAL 167-21.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 671 OF 2021
IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 167 OF 2021
Versus
State of Maharashtra and Anr. ...Respondents
Mr. Rajdeep D. Gude i/b Mr. Khandeparkar and Associates for the Applicants.
Mr. P.H.Gaikwad, A.P.P for the Respondent No.1-State.
CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. DATE : 7th APRIL, 2021
P.C. :
amend to implead the complainant as party Respondent. Leave granted. Amendment to be carried out forthwith.
1/3
Wakodikar
15a. IA 671-21 IN APEAL 167-21.doc
The applicants were, however, acquitted of the offences punishable under Section 326 r/w Section 149 of the Indian Penal
2/3
Wakodikar
15a. IA 671-21 IN APEAL 167-21.doc
Code and Section 3(1)(x) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.
REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.
3/3
Wakodikar
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an application for suspension of sentence and enlargement on bail can be accepted when no substantive sentence has been awarded.
Namdeo Narayan Ghadigaonkar and 5 Ors.
State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Revati Mohite Dere
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
