Allowed

Karmaveer Shankarrao Kale Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. v. Aurangabad Distilleries Ltd. and Another

Bombay HC16 Nov 2021IA/641/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Bombay allowed an interim application seeking the impleadment of a third party as an additional respondent in a writ petition, subject to exceptions to be raised at the final hearing.

What did the court decide?

The applicant is allowed to be impleaded in Writ Petition No. 11434 of 2017 as an additional respondent.

Karmaveer Shankarrao Kale Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2021)

¶1

IA 641-2021

¶2

Diksha Rane

¶3

Digitally signed by DIKSHA DIKSHA DINESH DINESH RANE RANE Date: 2021.11.17 11:02:51 +0530

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶5

INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 641 OF 2021 IN

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO. 11434 OF 2017

¶7

Karmaveer Shankarrao Kale Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. ..Applicant

¶8

In the matter between

¶9

Aurangabad Distilleries Ltd. & anr. ..Petitioners

¶10

vs. The State of Maharashtra & ors. ..Respondents ------------

¶11

Mr. Ishaan Patkar i/b. Jindagi Shah for applicant in IA/641/21..

¶12

Mr. A. Hidayatullah, Senior Advocate a/w. Makarand Joshi i/b. Max Legal for petitioner in WP/11434/17.

¶13

Mr. V.A. Sonpal a/w. Ms. Neha Bhide, ‘B’ Panel Counsel for respondent Nos. 1 to 3.

¶14

C0RAM : DIPANKAR DATTA, CJ & M. S. KARNIK, J.

¶15

DATE: NOVEMBER 16, 2021

¶16

P.C. :

¶17

The applicant in Interim Application No. 641 of 2021 seeks impleadment in Civil Writ Petition No. 11434 of 2017 on the ground that an interim order passed in such writ petition has directly affected his interest and without being impleaded, he may not have the opportunity to seek

¶18

¶19

IA 641-2021

¶20

vacation of such interim order.

¶21

Considering such pleaded case, we allow the applicant to be impleaded in this writ petition as an additional respondent subject to just exceptions that may be raised at the final hearing by the petitioner.

¶22

Consequential amendments to be carried out within a period of one week from today.

¶23

The application stands disposed of, without costs.

¶24

List the writ petition (Civil Writ Petition No.11434/2017) together with other writ petitions (Writ Petition (St.) No.93652/2020, Writ Petition (St.) No. 94011/2020, Writ Petition (St.) No. 5941/2020 , Writ Petition (St.) No.94191/2020, Writ Petition (St.) No.94193/2020, Writ Petition (St.) No.94194/2020, Writ Petition (St.) No. 94196/2020, Interim Application (St.) No. 94847/2020 in Writ Petition (st.) No. 11434/2017 and Writ Petition (St.) No.93763/2020) on December 14, 2021 .

¶25

(M.S. KARNIK, J.) (CHIEF JUSTICE)

¶26

Karmaveer Shankarrao Kale Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. v. Aurangabad Distilleries Ltd. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Karmaveer Shankarrao Kale Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. v. Aurangabad Distilleries Ltd. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sejal Shakti Realtors LLP Vs High Court on Its Own Motion and Ors.

Sunil Ramchandra Shinde vs Union of India and 4 Ors.

Sunil Ramchandra Shinde vs Union of India and 4 Ors.

Jindal Drugs Private Ltd. Vs the Union of India through and Ors.

D3 Arcade Pvt. Ltd. and 2 Ors. Vs PNB Housing Finance Ltd.

Sunil B. Malshikare Vs the Superintendent of Police, Thane and Anr.