The High Court of Judicature at Bombay disposed of an interim application and noted that with the disposal of the main appeal, the interim application ceases to exist.
The interim application stands disposed of as it does not survive the disposal of the main appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1
Rane
IA 493-21 in SA St. 2694-21 Sr.No.7
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 493 OF 2021
in
SECOND APPAEL (ST.) NO. 2694 OF 2021
Basavraj Mahalingappa Khairate
and Ors.
...Applicants
V/s.
Shobha Rajshekhar Khairate and Ors. ...Respondents
* * *
Mr. Prasad Kulkarni, Advocate for the Applicants.
Mr. Anil S. Kalekar, Advocate for the Respondents.
* * *
CORAM : SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.
W ednesday, 9th June, 2021.
(Through Video Conference)
P.C. :
With the disposal of the Appeal, the Interim Application does
not survive. The same stands disposed of.
(SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.)
Basavraj Mahalingappa Khairate
Shobha Rajshekhar Khairate
Sandeep K. Shinde
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court