In an interim application connected to a writ petition, the court accepted the petitioner's counsel's submission that no issue remained for consideration. The application was allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of without adjudication on merits.
Application allowed to be withdrawn; application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
rsk
25-IA-481-21.doc
1 / 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.481 OF 2021
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.1116 OF 2020
Vasanti R. Kamath and Ors.
...Applicants-Petitioners
vs.
Nandkishore C. Chourasia & Ors.
...Respondents
Mr. Abhishek Patil a/w. Clorisso Miranda i/b Mr. Sanjay Patankar for
Applicants-Petitioners.
CORAM : AMIT B. BORKAR, J.
DATE : 26 NOVEMBER 2021.
P. C. :
Learned Counsel for applicants states that the learned City
Civil Court has already taken written statement on record, therefore he
does not press the application. Application is allowed to be withdrawn.
Application is disposed of.
(AMIT B. BORKAR, J)
Digitally signed by RAJESHWARI RAJESHWARISUBODH SUBODH KARVE KARVE Date: 2021.11.27 16:00:28 +0530
Vasanti R. Kamath
Nandkishore C. Chourasia
AMIT B. BORKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court