IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
Intervention application allowed; disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
20-ia-408-21.odt
: 1 :
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 408 OF 2021
IN
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 147 OF 2021
Manisha Mahesh Sawant.... Intervenor
In the matter between:
Jiten Shah…. Applicant.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Anr..... Respondents
Ms. Rita Joshi i/b. Ashok D. Shetty for Intervenor.
Mr. Ujjwal Gandhi i/b. Tarun S. Sharma for Applicant in
ABA/147/2021.
Mr. S. S. Pednekar, APP for State/Respondent.
______
CORAM: SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.
DATE: 14th JULY, 2021
(Through Video Conferencing)
P.C. :
1.This is an application for intervention filed by the
original first informant.
2.Learned counsel for the original applicant in A.B.A. No.
147 of 2021 has no objection if the intervenor is heard in the main
application.
1 of 2
Gokhale
: 2 : 20-ia-408-21.odt
3.Therefore, Intervention application is allowed in terms
of prayer clause (A) and is disposed of, as such.
(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)
2 of 2
Jiten Shah
Manisha Mahesh Sawant
The State of Maharashtra & Anr
Sarang V. Kotwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court