Single judge allowed a civil application connected to a writ petition. Counsel undertook to file an affidavit of service of the interim application. No substantive legal proposition was analyzed.
Civil application allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b).
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1 24.IA.2681.2019.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2681 OF 2019
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 1458 OF 2019
Kaushalya Dashrath Dhanve & Anr. … Applicants.
Vs.
Lahu Mhatarbe Mergal & Anr.… Respondents
Mr. Abhijit Purushottam Kulkarni for the Applicants.
Mr. Y. D. Patil, AGP for the Respondent No.2.
CORAM: MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.
DATE : 6th AUGUST, 2021.
P. C:-
1. Mr. Abhijit Kulkarni, learned counsel appearing for the
Applicants states that this Interim Application is served on both the
Respondents. He undertakes to file affidavit of service within one
week.
2.In view of the reasons set out in the Civil Application, Civil
Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b).
(MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.)
Sonali
Kaushalya Dashrath Dhanve & Anr.
Lahu Mhatarbe Mergal & Anr.
Madhav J. Jamdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court