In this interim matter linked to an anticipatory bail application, the High Court, singly bench, allowed the interim application only to the extent of assisting the learned Appellant under Section 301(2) CrPC before disposing of the main application without granting substantive relief.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
25-IA-2234-2021.DOC
TRUPTI SADANAND BAMNE
Digitally signed by TRUPTI SADANAND BAMNE Date: 2021.11.25 00:24:15 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2234 OF 2021
IN
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1418 OF 2021
Karishma Pratish Desale...Intervenor
IN THE MATTER OF
Pratik Prabhakar Desale & Ors....Applicants
Versus
The State of Maharashtra...Respondent
Mr. Kedar Patil for the Applicant in IA.
Mr. H.J. Dedhia, APP for the Respondent -State.
Ms. Himneel Borse i/b. Mr.Sachin Chandan for the Applicants
In ABA.
CORAM:V.G.BISHT, J.
DATE:24TH NOVEMBER, 2021
PC:-
1. Heard.
2. The Interim Application is allowed only to extent of helping
learned APP in the matter in view of Section 301 (2) of the Code of
Criminal Procedure.
3. The Interim Application stands disposed of accordingly.
(V.G.BISHT, J. )
Trupti
1/1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the interim application should be allowed to assist the learned Appellant/Respondent State.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
The State of Maharashtra
Karishma Pratish Desale
V.G. Bisht
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court