Rs.45,000/- paid as ad-hoc royalty earlier). The Defendant neither paid the arrears nor the royalty fixed by the Receiver prospectively and in the premises, the Receiver’s report sought directions for future course of action. This court, after considering the objections of the Defendant, upheld the order of the Court Receiver fixing royalty in the sum of Rs.1,20,000/- per month from the date of the report, i.e. 1 June 2019. The court ordered the Defendant to pay arrears and continue to pay future royalty in the sum of Rs.1,20,000/- per month from the date of the report, i.e. 1 June 2019. In the event of the Defendant's failure to pay such arrears or future royalty, the Receiver was directed to take physical possession of the suit property by dispossessing the Defendant. This order has not been challenged by the Defendant and holds the field as of this date. In pursuance of this order, the Receiver did proceed to take possession of the suit property from the Defendant, since the Defendant, despite this order, neither paid arrears nor future royalty to the Court Receiver. The Defendant was dispossessed on 19 November 2019. The cause for the present interim application arises as a result of the Defendant’s stand that though he was required to deliver possession of the suit premises to the Court Receiver, his belongings, including furniture and fixtures installed by him within the premises, need not be removed, since this court purportedly did not pass any order of vacant possession and simply directed physical possession to be taken over by the Court Receiver.
