In an interim application linked to a dismissed writ petition, the Court held that since the main petition was dismissed, the interim application could not survive and disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
VIDYA Digitally signedby VIDYASURESH AMIN SURESHAMIN Date:2021.09.2311:10:05+0530
4.IA2193_2021.doc
Vidya Amin
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2193 OF 2021 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2239 OF 2021
Narayan Gajanan Thakur … Petitioner vs. The Managing Director, City and Industrial Development Corporation(CIDCO) & Ors. … Respondents
Mr. A.Y. Sakhare, Senior Advocate a/w. Mr. Rahul Thakur for the petitioner.
Mr. Nitin V. Gangal a/w. Mr. Ashok D. Kadam for respondent nos. 1 to 3/CIDCO.
Mr. P.P. Kakade, Government Pleader a/w. Ms. R.A. Salunkhe, AGP and Ms. G.R. Golatkar, AAGP for the State.
Mr. Saket Mone a/w. Mr. Devansh Shah i/b. Vidhi Partners for the intervenor/MMRDA.
CORAM :- DIPANKAR DATTA, CJ & G. S. KULKARNI, J.
DATE :- SEPTEMBER 20, 2021
PC :-
1. In view of dismissal of writ petition, Interim Application does
not survive and the same is accordingly disposed of.
(G. S. KULKARNI, J.) (CHIEF JUSTICE)
Page 1 of 1
Narayan Gajanan Thakur
The Managing Director, City and Industrial Development Corporation(CIDCO) & Ors.
State
MMRDA
Dipankar Datta
G. S. Kulkarni
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
