This interim application seeking amendment to a criminal writ petition was allowed, directing the petitioner to amend the petition and make the intervener a party respondent.
Interim application allowed; petitioner directed to amend the petition and make the intervener a party respondent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sherla V.
40_IA.146.2021.doc
Digitally signed by Vishwanath Vishwanath S. Sherla S. Sherla Date: 2021.01.20 18:27:48 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.146 OF 2021 IN
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.60 OF 2021
Machindra Maruti Sonavane … Applicant
IN THE MATTER BETWEEN:
Mahavir Bhaskarrao Kadam … Petitioner
Vs. State of Maharashtra & others … Respondents
Mr.A.M. Saraogi for the Applicant
Mr.B.D. Joshi, Mr.Virendra Pethe and Ms.Aarti Deodhar for Intervener
Ms.S.D. Shinde, APP, for Respondent – State Mr.A.P. Kulkarni for Respondent No.4
CORAM: S.S. SHINDE & MANISH PITALE, JJ.
DATED: JANUARY 20, 2021
P.C.:
1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. Persued the
contents of the Interim Application.
2. For the reasons stated in the Interim Application, it is allowed. Petitioner shall amend the petition and make the intervener as party respondent forthwith. The amended copy of
Page 1 of 2
40_IA.146.2021.doc
the petition be placed on record after serving the learned Counsel
appearing for the respective respondents.
3. Interim Application stands disposed of accordingly.
(MANISH PITALE, J.) (S.S. SHINDE, J.)
Page 2 of 2
Machindra Maruti Sonavane
Mahavir Bhaskarrao Kadam
State of Maharashtra
S.S. SHINDE
MANISH PITALE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
