L and T Finance Limited Vs
Case brief
What is this about?
Single judge allowed an interim application to amend execution applications by substituting CFM Asset Reconstruction Private Limited as the assignee of L & T Finance Limited. Order disposed of interim applications in terms.
What did the court decide?
Amendment to substitute CFM Asset Reconstruction Private Limited as the applicant was allowed; interim applications disposed of in terms.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1165 OF 2019
IN
EXECUTION APPLICATION NO.891 OF 2015
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1395 OF 2019
IN
EXECUTION APPLICATION NO.97 OF 2015
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1399 OF 2019
IN
EXECUTION APPLICATION NO.1878 OF 2015
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1824 OF 2019
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the name of the applicant in the execution applications should be amended to reflect the assignee of the debt.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
CFM Asset Reconstruction Private Limited
- other
L & T Finance Limited
- respondent
Wahid Munshi Shaikh & Anr.
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Dalian Huarui Heavy Industry International Co. Ltd. Vs West Quay Multiport Pvt. Ltd. and 2 Others
Anita Rajinder Rishi Vs Deepak Pandurang Pawar and Mukesh Nenshi Gala (Applicant) and the Learned Sheiff (Prop. Resp.)
Worldchildren Welfare Trust Bal Anand Vs Rajesh Jayram Mundekar and Shalini R. Mundekar (Prop. Parents) Rutvi Alias Nivisha-Minor
L and T Finance Limited Vs Wahid Munshi Shaikh and Anr. and Cfm Asset Reconstruction Private Limited (Applicant)