4 Learned senior counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant was prosecuted along with her deceased husband i.e. accused No. 2-Samdarshi Jaiswal, who expired in 2015, during the trial. He submits that the applicant cannot be held liable for the acts and deeds of her husband i.e. accused no. 2, as accused No. 2 was running the business, and that the applicant was merely shown as the Director, of accused No. 1 Company-M/s. KMP Syntex Pvt. Ltd., on paper. He submits that the Customs Department had issued notice to the applicant’s husband and that no show-cause notice was ever issued to the applicant nor any of her assets were attached. Learned senior counsel for the applicant further submits that the applicant had a good case on merits and as such the order directing the applicant to deposit the fine amount imposed on the applicant, be stayed. He further on instructions of the applicant submits that the applicant has Rs. 33,07,947/- in her account with the Central bank of India, Andheri (West) Branch and that the applicant undertakes not to withdraw the said amount till the appeal is finally heard. He further submits that the applicant has already deposited Rs. 33 lakhs in the Registry of the trial Court and that the applicant also undertakes not to file any application for withdrawal of the said amount, which is lying in the Registry of the trial Court. Learned senior counsel further submits that the amount lying in the
