Allowed
Avyaay Anirhdh Garg and 2 Ors. v. Ajay Kumar Garg and 24 Ors.
Bombay HCGP/3/2021
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Held that since the petitioner requested appointment of the father (already a party) as guardian of the minor, no notice under Section 11 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 was required, and the guardianship petition was allowed.
What did the court decide?
The guardianship petition was allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) for appointment of Defendant No.4 as guardian.