The High Court dismissed two family court appeals and a civil application as withdrawn by mutual agreement of the appellant-husband and respondent-wife regarding their divorce dispute.
Disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
5.18fca etc
(1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
942 FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.5 OF 2018 WITH FCA/31/2018 WITH CA/761/2018 IN FCA/5/2018
RAJESH NARESH JADHAV
VERSUS
SAU. PALLAVI RAJESH JADHAV
Ms. P. B. Waghmare, Advocate for appellant; Ms. A. N. Gore, Advocate h/f Mr A. P. Ghule Patil, Advocate for respondent
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND S. G. MEHARE, JJ. DATE : 22nd December, 2021
PER COURT:
(S. G. MEHARE, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)
sjk
RAJESH NARESH JADHAV
SAU. PALLAVI RAJESH JADHAV
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE
S. G. MEHARE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
