The High Court disposed of the appeal and accompanied civil application as withdrawn by the appellant State of Maharashtra, acknowledging a mutually accepted agreement on compensation rate.
Appeal and Civil Application No. 382/2002 disposed of as withdrawn
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
34-FA558-01-SPM.DOC
Santosh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
FIRST APPEAL NO. 558 OF 2001 WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 382 OF 2002
(Order is corrected as per speaking to the minutes of order dtd.24/11/2021.)
The State of Maharashtra ...Appellant
Versus
Bhaskar Shrawan Naik & ors. …Respondents
Mr. Y. Y. Dabake, AGP for the Appellant/State. Ms. Rupali L. Dhivar, for Respondent no.1.
SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI
Digitally signed by SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI Date: 2021.11.24 15:03:55 +0530
Mr. Ramesh Thawal, Nayab Tahsildar, Land Acquisition, Metro Centre, 3, Thane, present.
Mr. Bhaskar Naik, Respondent no.1, present.
CORAM: N. J. JAMADAR, J. DATED : 25th OCTOBER, 2021
PC:-
State/appellant and Ms. Dhivar, the learned Counsel for respondent no.1.
1/2
34-FA558-01-SPM.DOC
[N. J. JAMADAR, J.]
2/2
State of Maharashtra
Bhaskar Shrawan Naik & ors.
N. J. JAMADAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
