Criminal Misc. Civil Application moved by an original complainant to intervene in an associated Writ Petition filed before this High Court. The Court allowed the application solely for the purpose of intervention.
Application allowed only for intervention in the companion Writ Petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
3-CRMA 68-21.DOC
vinita
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA. CRIMINAL MISC. CIVIL APPLCATION NO.68 OF 2021.
IN
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 80 OF 2018.
… Applicant.
DR. OLAV ALBUQUERQUE … Applicant. VS STATE OF GOA, THR. THE SR. POLICE INSPECTOR, PORVORIM POLICE STATION, PORVORIM AND ANR ...Respondents.
Mr. V. Toraskar, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. S. G. Bhobe, Public Prosecutor for the respondents. Ms. C. Collasso, Advocate for the original petitioner.
CORAM: MANISH PITALE, J. DATED: 21st December, 2021.
P.C.:
1. This application is moved on behalf of the original complainant seeking to intervene in the present Writ Petition. Attention of this Court is invited to an order dated 17.3.2021 passed in a similar application filed on behalf of the applicant(original complainant), to intervene in the companion Writ Petition i.e Writ Petition No.86/2018. By the said order the prayer of the applicant for intervening in the matter was granted.
Page 1 of 2
3-CRMA 68-21.DOC
2. The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State have invited attention of this Court to the prayer clauses in the present application. It is submitted by the learned Public Prosecutor that while there could be no objection for granting prayer clause(a) i.e. permitting the applicant to intervene in the present Writ Petition, other payers clauses are beyond the scope of the present application.
3. This Court has perused the application. Since, the applicant is original complainant in the present matter, there ought not be any impediment in granting prayer clause(a).
4. In view of the above, application is allowed only in terms of prayer clause(a). Consequent amendment to be carried out by the petitioner within a period of two weeks from today.
5. Application stands disposed of.
MANISH PITALE,J.
Digitally signed by VINITA VIKAS VINITA VIKAS NAIK NAIK Date: 2021.12.21 16:19:25 +05'30'
Page 2 of 2
Dr. Olav Albuquerque
State of Goa
Sr. Police Inspector, Porvorim Police Station
Manish Pitala
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
