Nasir Abdul Karim Khan Vs V.P.K. Urban Co-Operative Credit Society Ltd., Rep. by Its Field Assistant, Narayan Laxman Gaude

1. By this application, the applicant is seeking suspension of sentence imposed by the Magistrate. It is pointed out that during the pendency of the appeal before the Session Court, the applicant had deposited an amount of Rs.1,41,000/-, which is still lying in deposit.

¶15

Page 1 of 2 8th Sept.2021

¶16

910- CRMA 48 21 IN CRIR 8 2021

¶17

2. It is further submitted that the applicant is ready to deposit further amount as pre-condition for suspension of sentence.

¶18

3. Considering the fact that the Magistrate directed payment of compensation of Rs.5,64,000/- to the respondent, it would be in the interest of justice that the applicant deposits a further amount of Rs.1,09,000/- (Rupees One lakh nine thousand only) before the Sessions Court as a pre -condition for suspension of sentence.

¶19

4. In view of the above, this application is disposed of by suspending the sentence imposed on the applicant subject to the applicant depositing an amount of Rs.1,09,000/- before the concerned Sessions Court within a period of six weeks from today.

¶20

5. It is made clear that if the amount is not deposited within the stipulated period of time, the present order shall stand withdrawn and the application for suspension of sentence shall stand dismissed.

¶21

MANISH PITALE, J.

¶22

Page 2 of 2 8th Sept.2021

Nasir Abdul Karim Khan v. V.P.K. Urban Co-Operative Credit Society Ltd., Rep. by Its Field Assistant, Narayan Laxman Gaude

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nasir Abdul Karim Khan v. V.P.K. Urban Co-Operative Credit Society Ltd., Rep. by Its Field Assistant, Narayan Laxman Gaude

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajesh Gunvantrai Gandhi vs Lavjibhai Dhanjibhai Mehta (Deceased)

Roshan B. Naik, Rep. by Their Attorney, Siddesh B. Naik and 3 Ors., Vs the Communidade of Sancoale, Thr. Its Attorney, Satish Narvekar.

Sandesh Anand Kamat Helekar and 2 Ors., Vs La Marwel Residents Welfare Association, Rep. by Its President, Evaristo Fernandes and 6 Ors.

Shree Mallikarjuna Shipping Pvt. Ltd., Rep. by Its Aut. Rep., Bhushan Honavarkar Vs Azghar Khan

Deepak Arondekar Vs State of Goa, Officer Incharge, P.I. Porvorim Police Station, Mapusa and Anr.

Laxmi H. Rathod Vs State of Goa, Thr. P.I. Attached to Calangute Police Station, Calangute and Anr.