The court disposed of a contempt petition held to be purged by the respondents' belated apology, deciding the underlying application as per earlier orders.
The contempt petition was disposed of; no costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
980 cp.367.21.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
980 CONTEMPT PETITION NO.367 OF 2021
IN WP/3746/2018
VISHNU ASHOK BODAKHE AND OTHERS VERSUS SANJAY BANKAR AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. R. C. Bora, Mr. N. R. Thorat. AGP for Respondent/State: Mr. A. R. Kale.
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA & R. N. LADDHA, JJ. DATE : 06th October, 2021.
P.C.:
[ R. N. LADDHA, J. ]
nga
Vishnu Ashok Bodakhe
Sanjay Bankar
S. V. Gangapurwala
R. N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
