Petitioners sought to withdraw multiple contempt petitions filed against Zahra Developers. The Court allowed the withdrawal based on the petitioners' intention to proceed in execution of the underlying consent decrees and subsequently disposed of the petitions.
Withdrawal of contempt petitions allowed; petitions disposed of in the terms specified.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 21 OF 2013
IN
SUIT NO. 2608 OF 2010
Shakuntala N. Raut
… Petitioner
vs.
Zahra Developers and 2 Ors.
… Respondents
WITH
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 22 OF 2013
IN
SUIT NO. 3162 OF 2010
Shakuntala N. Raut & Anr.
… Petitioners
vs.
Zahra Developers and 2 Ors.
… Respondents
WITH
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 23 OF 2013
IN
SUIT NO. 2645 OF 2010
Sunanda R. Shetty
… Petitioner
vs.
Zahra Developers and 2 Ors.
… Respondents
WITH
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 24 OF 2013
IN
SUIT NO. 2642 OF 2010
Rossi M. D’souza
… Petitioner
vs.
Zahra Developers and 2 Ors.
WITH
RAJESHWARI RAMESH PILLAI
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 25 OF 2013
IN
SUIT NO. 2643 OF 2010
Digitally signed by RAJESHWARI RAMESH PILLAI Date: 2021.11.18 17:49:53 +0530
1/3
14-conp-21-27-2013.odt rrpillai
Salima Sathar … Petitioner
vs.
Zahra Developers and 2 Ors. … Respondents
WITH
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 26 OF 2013
IN
SUIT NO. 2609 OF 2010
Anthony J. Pinto
… Petitioner
vs.
Zahra Developers and 2 Ors.
… Respondents
WITH
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 27 OF 2013
IN
SUIT NO. 2644 OF 2010
Laxmi M. Pujari
… Petitioner
vs.
Zahra Developers and 2 Ors.
… Respondents
Ms. Sarika Mehta i/b. L.J. Law for the Petitioners.
Mr. Yash Tiwari i/b. M/s. K. P. Tiwari & Co. for Respondent nos. 1 to 3.
CORAM : A. K. MENON, J. DATED : 17th NOVEMBER, 2021
P.C. :
1. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that she has instructions to
proceed in execution of the decree passed in terms of the consent terms and that she has instructions to withdraw these contempt petitions. She states that she will proceed in execution of the decrees in terms of the consent terms. In
2/3
14-conp-21-27-2013.odt rrpillai
view thereof I pass the following order:
applicants intention of proceeding in execution.
(ii) Petitions are disposed in the above terms.
3/3
14-conp-21-27-2013.odt rrpillai
Shakuntala N. Raut
Zahra Developers
Salima Sathar
Anthony J. Pinto
Laxmi M. Pujari
Sunanda R. Shetty
A. K. Menon
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
