No substantive issue was decided. The High Court disposed of a Civil Application relying on the advanced age of the parties (over 70 years) to grant priority for hearing of the accompanying Writ Petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
33.caw.80.21.doc
Ajay
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 80 OF 2021
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 6103 OF 2014
Versus
Gundo Digambar Buva and Ors. .. Respondents
CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J. DATE : 16th DECEMBER, 2021.
P.C.:
Heard Mr. Ingle, learned counsel appearing for the
Applicant. None for the Respondents.
and more specifically that most of the parties before the Court are more than 70 years old, the Writ Petition deserves to be heard at an early date.
the hearing of the Writ Petition shall be given to the Petitioners / Advocate for the Petitioners by the Advocate for the Applicants.
Digitally signed AJAYTRAMBAKUGALMUGALE by AJAYTRAMBAKUGALMUGALEDate: 2021.12.16 19:08:58 +0530
1 of 1
Bandu Sakharam Randive and Ors.
Gundo Digambar Buva and Ors.
MILIND N. JADHAV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
