Disposed

Devasthan Committee - Shinoli and Ors. v. Radhakrushna Avdhut Tavasvi and Anr.

Bombay HC29 Sept 2021CAW/43/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of the writ petition on the merits of a settlement agreement. The respondent surrendered claims to the disputed land in favor of the petitioners for Rs. 17 Lakhs, and the petitioners agreed to withdraw the suit. Consequently, the interim applications and civil application were also disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition was disposed of on the terms of the settlement; interim applications and civil application disposed of with no costs.

Devasthan Committee - Shinoli and Ors. Vs Radhakrushna… — Property and Title | Bombay HC (2021)

¶1

23-wp 3366-21@IA 98@caw 43@IA 1576.doc

¶2

Prajakta Vartak

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO.3366 OF 2021 WITH

¶5

INTERIM APPLICATION NO.98 OF 2019

¶6

WITH

¶7

CIVIL APPLICATION NO.43 OF 2021

¶8

WITH

¶9

INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1576 OF 2021

¶10

Devasthan Committee & Ors.

¶11

...Petitioners

¶12

V/s.

¶13

Radhakrushna Avdhut Tavasvi & Anr. ...Respondents

¶14

Mr. Yuvraj Narvankar for Petitioners/Applicants. Mr. Radhakrushna Avdhut Tapaswi-Respondent No.1 present Mr.Ashok Vitthal Borade, Trustee of the Petitioner No.1 present.

¶15

CORAM : G. S. KULKARNI, J. DATE : SEPTEMBER 29, 2021

¶16

PC :

¶17

By this writ petition, the petitioners challenge an order dated 2 July, 2018 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Khed in Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 15 of 2014, the operative portion of which reads as under:-

¶18

“ ORDER

¶19

1] Civil Misc. Application No. 15/2014 (Old Civil Misc. Application No.97/2009) is allowed with costs.

¶20

2] The order passed by the learned Joint Charity Commissioner, Pune Region Pune passed in Revision Application No. 1/2008 dated 25/11/2008 is set aside.

¶21

3] Gat Nos. 751 & 758 (Old No.1680 and 1742) situated at Shinoli, Tal.Ambegaon, Dist; Pune, be deleted from the column of Trust properties of Trust ‘Deosthan Committee Shinoli’ bearing PTR No. A/1506/Pune.”

¶22

1/3

¶23

23-wp 3366-21@IA 98@caw 43@IA 1576.doc

¶24

Mr. Narvankar, learned counsel for the petitioners states that there is a settlement between the parties titled as “RECEIPT” dated 14 July, 2021 as executed between the petitioners and respondent no.1-Radhakrushna Avdhut Tapaswi which has taken place between the parties. Such settlement is already placed on record on 2 September, 2021 before this Court (Nitin W. Sambre, J.) as recorded in the office noting dated 2 September, 2021.

¶25

By virtue of such settlement, the parties have agreed that the respondent no.1-Radhakrushna Avdhut Tapaswi has relinquished and surrendered all his claims, right and interest in respect of the land in question in favour of the petitioners in lieu of Shri. Radhakrushna Avdhut Tapaswi having agreed to accept a full and final consideration of Rs.17,00,000/- (Rs. Seventeen Lakhs), the details of which are set out in paragraph (4) of the said settlement terms. As set out in paragraph 5 of the settlement terms, the petitioner no.1 has agreed to withdraw the writ petition filed against the respondent no.1-Radhakrushna Avdhut Tapaswi as per the settlement.

¶26

The respondent no.1-Radhakrushna Avdhut Tapaswi is present in the Court. He has identified himself by tendering a copy of the Aadhar Card. He is also identified by Mr.Ashok Borade, Trustee of the petitioner no.1 who is present in the Court. Mr.Ashok Borade, Trustee of the petitioner no.1 is identified by Mr. Narvankar, learned counsel for the petitioners.

¶27

The respondent no.1-Radhakrushna Avdhut Tapaswi, on a query made by the Court, states that he has received an amount of Rs.17 Lakhs. He has knowledge as to what has been agreed by him in the said

¶28

2/3

¶29

23-wp 3366-21@IA 98@caw 43@IA 1576.doc

¶30

settlement terms. On a further query made by the court in regard to the details of the land, he has given correct answers about the details of the land. The settlement terms titled as “RECEIPT” is signed on behalf of the petitioners as also by the respondent no.1-Radhakrushna Avdhut Tapaswi before Notary Sanjay Tukaram Patankar, Pune Dist. Maharashtra. The consent terms were already tendered on 2 September, 2021 and marked “X” which are considered as accepted. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of in terms of the said consent terms.

¶31

The interim applications as well as civil application would not survive. They are accordingly disposed of. No costs.

¶32

3/3

Devasthan Committee - Shinoli and Ors. v. Radhakrushna Avdhut Tavasvi and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Devasthan Committee - Shinoli and Ors. v. Radhakrushna Avdhut Tavasvi and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chairman/ Secretary, Narmada Niwas Co-Op. Hsg. Soc. Ltd. Vs Mr. Vinod Malshi Shah and Ors.

Chairman/ Secretary, Narmada Niwas Co-Op. Hsg. Soc. Ltd. Vs Mr. Virendra Krishna Singh and Ors.

Seth M. Prasad and Anr. Vs Gautam Shripad Dongre and Ors.

Superintending Agricultural Officer Nashik and Ors. Vs Sham W. Gaikwad and Ors.

Yogini Dilip Khandage Vs the Additional Divisional Commissioner Pune and Ors.

Antop Hill Warehousing Company Ltd. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.