Allowed

Snehal Ramesh Rangari and Others v. the State of Maharashtra through Secretary Urban Development Dept. and Others

Bombay HC7 Oct 2021CAW/1518/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bench allowed Civil Application No. 1518 of 2021. The High Court permitted necessary amendments in the pending Writ Petition No. 366 of 2020 and set a deadline for compliance.

What did the court decide?

Necessary amendments in the petition allowed to be carried out by the next date; copy to be supplied to respondents with liberty to file response.

Snehal Ramesh Rangari and Others Vs the State of… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2021)

¶1

1 / 1 25-WP 366.2020

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR

¶3

CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1518 OF 2021 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 366 OF 2020

¶4

(Snehal Ramesh Rangari and ors. vs. The State of Maharashtra and ors.)

¶5

Office notes, Office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances, Court's orders
or directions and Registrar's orders.

¶6

Court's or Judge's Orders.

¶7

Mr. G. K. Mundhada, Advocate for petitioners.
Ms. Mayuri Deshmukh, AGP for respondent Nos.1, 2,& 4.

¶8

CORAM :SUNIL B. SHUKRE AND
ANIL S. KILOR, JJ.
DATE :07/10/2021

¶9

For the reasons stated in the application, the
same is allowed. Necessary amendments be carried out
on or before the next date.

¶10

2.Copy of the amended petition be supplied to
the learned AGP and learned counsel for the respective
respondents, with liberty to the respondents to file their
response to the same.

¶11

3. Stand over to two weeks.

¶12

JUDGE JUDGE

¶13

KOLHE

Snehal Ramesh Rangari and Others v. the State of Maharashtra through Secretary Urban Development Dept. and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Snehal Ramesh Rangari and Others v. the State of Maharashtra through Secretary Urban Development Dept. and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Muzaffar Khan S/O. Mukaddar Khan Vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Principal Secretary, Urban Development Dept., Mumbai and Others

Ritvi D/O Pankaj Golechha, Thr. Guardian Father Pankaj K. Golechha and Others Vs Central Board of Secondary Education, Pune Thr. Regional Director and Another

Chitra W/O Gajanan Deshpande Vs State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, Urban Development Department, Mumbai and Others

Tejas S/O Ramesh Katole Vs Scheduled Tribes Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Thr Member Sec. and Dy. Director and Others

Jagjivan Motiram Wasnik Vs the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Its Principal Secretary, Urban Development Dept., Mumbai and Others

Mir Sadique Ali Vs State of Maharashtra through Principal Chief Secretary, Mumbai and Others