Civil application to recall an order dismissing a writ petition for non-prosecution. Court condoned a two-day delay and restored the writ petition.
Order dated 04th May, 2018 setting aside for non-prosecution is quashed and writ petition restored.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1498 OF 2018
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 5759 OF 2018
Smt. Rani Jagannath Survase & Anr.
…Applicants/
Petitioners
Versus
Indumati Dattatraya Solse And Ors.
…Respondents
D. W. Bhosale – Advocate for the Applicants/Petitioners
Samruddhi S. Ghadigaonkar i/by Sachin Chandan - Advocate for
the Respondents.
CORAM :MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.
DATE : 11th MARCH 2021
P.C. :
Civil Application is for recall/setting aside of order dated
04th May, 2018 passed by the learned Single Judge by which the
writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution. Learned Advocate
Samruddhi S. Ghadigaonkar, on behalf of the Respondents,
strongly opposes the application. According to her submission,
there are no reasons given in the application for restoration.
However in the interest of justice the delay in filing the application
for restoration of two days is condoned and order dated 04th May,
2018 passed in above Writ Petition dismissing the petition for non-
prosecution is set aside and writ petition is restored. Accordingly,
Civil Application is disposed of.
1/1
[MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.]
Seema
Smt. Rani Jagannath Survase & Anr.
Indumati Dattatraya Solse And Ors.
Madhav J. Jandhar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court