Allowed

Vijay S/O Sudama Janbandhu v. State of Maharashtra,Thr. Secretary,Dept. of Special Assistant and Social Welfare and Others

Bombay HC20 Oct 2021CAW/1222/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allowed correction petitions in W.P. No.1028/2020 and W.P. No.1029/2020 for amendments to be carried out within seven days. Order permits filing amended copies on record with liberty to the State to file additional reply. Matter disposed of accordingly after hearing.

What did the court decide?

Amendments to be carried out within seven days; copy of amended petition filed on record with liberty to the State to file additional reply.

Vijay S/O Sudama Janbandhu Vs State of Maharashtra,Thr. Secretary,Dept. of Special Assistant and Social Welfare and Others — Bombay HC (2021) — LawSathi Research

¶1

1 W.P.No.1028.2020

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO. 1028 OF 2020

¶4

Manohar S/o Bapurao Dabhade,

¶5

..VS..

¶6

State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, Department of Special Assistance and Social
Welfare, Mantralaya, Mumbai and Ors.,

¶7

WITH

¶8

WRIT PETITION NO. 1029 OF 2020

¶9

Vijay S/o Sudama Janbhandhu,

¶10

..VS..

¶11

State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, Department of Special Assistance and Social
Welfare, Mantralaya, Mumbai and Ors.,

¶12

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders
appearances, Court's orders of directions
and Registrar's orders

¶13

Shri P. D. Meghe, Advocate for petitioners in both petitions.
Shri N. R. Patil, A.G.P. for respondent Nos.1 to 4 and 7 in both
petitions.

¶14

CORAM : SUNIL B. SHUKRE AND

¶15

ANIL S. KILOR, JJ.

¶16

 DATED: 20.10.2021

¶17

C.A.No.1223 of 2021 in W.P.NO.1028 OF 2020 &

¶18

C.A.NO.1222 OF 2021 in W.P.NO.1029 OF 2020 .

¶19

1.For the reasons stated in the applications, the
applications are allowed.

¶20

2. Amendments be carried out within seven days.

¶21

2 W.P.No.1028.2020

¶22

3. Copy of the amended petition be filed on record and also furnished to the learned A.G.P. for the State with liberty to file additional reply in the matter.

¶23

4. Both these applications are disposed of accordingly.

¶24

W.P.NO.1028 OF 2020 & W.P.NO.1029 OF 2020 .

¶25

1. Let these petitions be heard together with Writ Petition No.5232 of 2017, involving same issue, which have been admitted by this Court for final hearing.

¶26

2. In view of above, Rule .

¶27

3. Stand over after eight weeks.

¶28

JUDGE JUDGE

¶29

Kirtak

Vijay S/O Sudama Janbandhu v. State of Maharashtra,Thr. Secretary,Dept. of Special Assistant and Social Welfare and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vijay S/O Sudama Janbandhu v. State of Maharashtra,Thr. Secretary,Dept. of Special Assistant and Social Welfare and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mr. Sanjay Surendrakumar Arora Vs the Union of India, through Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Department of Financial Services and 5

Mr. Sunil S/O Nandalal Malviya Vs Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. Mumbai and Another

Shri. Yogiraj Sushikshit Berojgar Nagrik Seva Saha. Sanstha Mary., Thr. President Ravindra Sapkal Vs the Municipal Commissioner, Amravati Municipal Corporation, Amravati

M/S. Vinayak Stones, Amravati, Thr. Authorised Partner, Saket S/O. Ajay Mehta Vs State of Maharashtra, in the Ministry of Revenue and Forest, Thr. Its Secretary, Mumbai and Others

Ramkrushna S/O Pandurangji Katre Vs State of Maharashtra, Ministry of Revenue and Forest, Mumbai through Secretary and Others

Deepali Wd/O Vilasrao Pande Vs State of Maharashtra, Ministry of Revenue and Forest, Mumbai through Secretary and Others