This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 wp2947.20
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
CIVIL APPLICATION (CAW) NO. 1065 OF 2021 IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 2947 OF 2020
(HIRALAL RAMAJI SAHARE & TWO OTH...VS..ACCOUNTANT GENERAL & OTH.)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders
appearances, Court's orders of directions
and Registrar's orders
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Shri Prashant Shende, Advocate for Petitioners.
Ms P.N.Mehta, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos.1 to 3.
Shri K.A.Mishra, Adv. h/f. Shri S.R.Bhongade, Adv.for Resp.No.4.
CORAM : SUNIL B. SHUKRE AND ANIL S. KILOR, JJ.
DATED:AUGUST 26, 2021.
1. Heard.
2. The learned A.G.P. and the learned counsel
for the respondent No.4 do not have any objection to this
application, therefore, for the reasons stated in the
application, the application is allowed.
3. The amendment be carried out within one
week.
4.Copy of the amended petition be furnished to
the other side with liberty to file appropriate responses in
the matter.
5.Writ Petition be listed for hearing/ further
consideration after three weeks.
(ANIL S.KILOR,J) (SUNIL B. SHUKRE,J)
RRaut..
HIRALAL RAMAJI SAHARE & TWO OTHERS
ACCOUNTANT GENERAL
RESPONDENT NO.4
SUNIL B. SHUKRE
ANIL S. KILOR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court