Disposed

Pankaj S/O Ganesh Bhingare v. State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Education Department, Mumbai and Others

Bombay HC7 Sept 2021CAW/1053/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Civil applications were allowed and disposed of with liberty to respondents to reply. Amended petitions to be furnished to respondents within four weeks. No substantive decisions were recorded beyond the allowance of amendments.

What did the court decide?

All civil applications allowed and disposed of. Liberties granted to respondents to file additional reply if any.

Pankaj S/O Ganesh Bhingare Vs State of Maharashtra… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2021)

¶1

11-caw 1056(4) of 20.odt

¶2

1/2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

¶4

CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1056 OF 2020 IN

¶5

CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 8556 OF 2019

¶6

Bansilal Sitraj Kanoje -Vs- State Of Maharashtra and ors.

¶7

WITH

¶8

CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1055 OF 2020 IN

¶9

CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 8557 OF 2019

¶10

Neeta Ashokumr Dubey -Vs- State Of Maharashtra and ors.

¶11

WITH

¶12

CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1053 OF 2020 IN

¶13

CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 8558 OF 2019

¶14

Pankaj Ganesh Bhingare -Vs- State Of Maharashtra and ors.

¶15

WITH

¶16

CIVIL APPLICATIONNO.1054 OF 2020 IN

¶17

CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 8559 OF 2019

¶18

Atul Janrao Khandekar -Vs- State of Maharashtra and ors.

¶19

Office notes, Office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances, Court's ordersCourt's or Judge's Orders.
or directions and Registrar's orders.

¶20

Mr. C.A. Joshi, counsel for the petitioners.

¶21

Mr. A.S. Fulzele, AGP for respondent Nos. 1 and 2 in all the writ petitions..
Mr. A.J. Thakkar, counsel for respondent Nos.3 and 4 in all the writ
petitions.

¶22

 CORAM : SUNIL B.SHUKRE &
 ANIL S.KILOR, JJ.
DATE : 07.09.2021.

¶23

Kavita

¶24

11-caw 1056(4) of 20.odt

¶25

2/2

¶26

1. Heard.

¶27

2. For the reasons mentioned in the applications, all the applications are allowed.

¶28

3.The amendments be carried out on or before the
next date with liberty to the respondents to file
additional reply, if any.

¶29

4.Copy of the amended petition be furnished to
the respondents.

¶30

5. Civil applications stand disposed of.

¶31

WRIT PETITON NOS. 8556, 8557, 8558 and 8559 of 2019

¶32

6. Stand over after four weeks.

¶33

(ANIL S. KILOR,J) (SUNIL B. SHUKRE,J)

¶34

Kavita

Pankaj S/O Ganesh Bhingare v. State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Education Department, Mumbai and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pankaj S/O Ganesh Bhingare v. State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Education Department, Mumbai and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jatin Prabhakar Ghotekar Vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Higher Secondary and Technical Education, Mumbai and Others

Khateshwar Magasvargiya Bahuddeshiya Vyaysayik Shikshan Sanstha, Amravati Thr. President Vs State of Maharashtra, Thr Principal Secretary Social Justice and Special Assistance, Mumbai and Ors.

Lila Wd/O Dashrath Chauhan and Another Vs State of Maharashtra through Secretary, General Administration Department, Mumbai and Others

Ramakant S/O Umashankar Khetan Thr. P.O.A. Syed Zakir Ali Syed Ibrahim Ali Vs State of Maharashtra, through Its Secretary, Revenue Dept., Mumbai and Others

Shri Surendra S/O Harishchandraji Patil and Others Vs State of Mah.,Thr.Principal Secretary, Department of Rural Development and Water Conservation and 1

Sau. Swati Sunil Nimbolkar Vs Additional District and Session Judge, Mangrulpir and Another