Allowed

The Exe. Director, Tapi Pathbandhare Vikas Mahamandal, Jalgaon and Others v. Ravindrasing Bhagwansing Deshmukh

Bombay HC28 Jun 2021CA/5651/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bench allowed civil applications seeking condonation of significant delay in filing three first appeals regarding land revenue award orders. The court held that the delay deserved condonation based on established Supreme Court precedents.

What did the court decide?

The civil applications seeking condonation of delay are allowed and the first appeals were registered.

The Exe. Director, Tapi Pathbandhare Vikas… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Bombay HC (2021)

¶1

¶2

9-CA-5648-2021.odt

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5648 OF 2021
IN
FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 5252 OF 2021

¶5

The Exe. Director Tapi Pathbandhare Vikas Mahamandal Jalgaon

¶6

& Ors.

¶7

Versus
Rajendrasing Kesharsing Deshmukh

¶8

CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5651 OF 2021
IN
FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO.5203 OF 2021

¶9

The Exe. Director Tapi Pathbandhare Vikas Mahamandal Jalgaon

¶10

& Ors.

¶11

Versus
Ravindrasingh Bhagwansing Deshmukh

¶12

…
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5653 OF 2021
IN
FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO.5207 OF 2021

¶13

The Exe. Director Tapi Pathbandhare Vikas Mahamandal Jalgaon &
Ors.

¶14

Versus
Virendrasing Yogendrasingh Deshmukh

¶15

Advocate for Applicants/Appellants in all Applications: Mr. Rahul A.
Tambe

¶16

CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE &
 AVINASH G. GHAROTE, JJ.

¶17

DATE : 28th June, 2021

¶18

¶19

9-CA-5648-2021.odt

¶20

P. C.:

¶21

1.In all these applications, the appellants/applicants pray
for condonation of delay of 66 days in the first appeal and 73 days in
the other two appeals, caused in filing the first appeals for
challenging the award dated 11.10.2019 in LRA No.806 of 2010,
dated 4.10.2019 in LRA No.803 of 2010 and LRA No.804 of 2010.

¶22

2.Considering the minor delay caused in filing these
appeals and the reasons assigned, we find that the law laid down by
the Hon’ble Apex Court in the matter of Collector Land Acquisition
Anantnag & Anr. Vs. MST. Katiji & Ors. reported in 1987SCR (2) 387
and Esha Bhattacharjee Vs. Managing Committee of Raghunathpur
Nafar Academy & Ors., reported in 2013 (12) SCC 649, the delay
deserves to be condoned. Accordingly, the Civil Applications seeking
condonation of delay are allowed. The first appeals be registered.

¶23

 (AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)

¶24

Sameer

The Exe. Director, Tapi Pathbandhare Vikas Mahamandal, Jalgaon and Others v. Ravindrasing Bhagwansing Deshmukh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Exe. Director, Tapi Pathbandhare Vikas Mahamandal, Jalgaon and Others v. Ravindrasing Bhagwansing Deshmukh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Hanumant Uttamrao Jadhav and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Somnath Vishnupant Thone and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Khandappa Kalappa Kantekure and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Sachin Ramdas Wagh Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

The Exe. Director, Tapi Pathbandhare Vikas Mahamandal, Jalgaon and Others Vs Virendrasing Yogendrasing Deshmukh

The Exe. Director, Tapi Pathbandhare Vikas Mahamandal, Jalgaon and Others Vs Rajendrasing Kesharsing Deshmukh