The High Court at Aurangabad allowed the applicant 's civil application for amendment to insert subsequent events concerning refusal of pension proposal in a pending writ petition.
Civil application for amendment allowed with directions to complete amendment within fourteen days and serve copy on other side.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 ca 5104.21
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5104 OF 2021 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 7517 OF 2013
Dagdu Anaton Jadhav
.. Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others .. Non Applicants
Shri A. S. Bayas, Advocate for the Applicant. Shri P. K. Lakhotiya, A.G.P. for Non Applicant Nos. 1 and 2. Shri M. V. Navandar, Advocate for Non Applicant Nos. 3 and 4.
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND R. N. LADDHA, JJ. DATE : 04TH AUGUST, 2021.
FINAL ORDER :
. Heard Mr. Bayas, the learned advocate for the applicant/petitioner, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and Mr. Navandar, the learned advocate for respondent Nos. 3 and 4.
2 ca 5104.21
[R. N. LADDHA, J.] [S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.]
bsb/Aug. 21
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to amend his writ petition to place subsequent events regarding pension refusal on record.
Dagdu Anaton Jadhav
The State of Maharashtra
S. V. Gangapurwala
R. N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
