Dismissed
Wajid Khuddus Kazi and Anr. v. Abdul Rauf Banemiya Kazi
Bombay HCCA/3824/2020
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
915 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3824 OF 2020
IN SAST/20287/2018
WITH
CA/3825/2020 IN SAST/20287/2018
WAJID KHUDDUS KAZI AND ANR
VERSUS
ABDUL RAUF BANEMIYA KAZI
Mr. P.K. Deshmukh, Advocate h/f Mr. B.R. Sontakke Patil, Advocate for
applicants
Mr. S.C. Bhosale, Advocate h/f Mr. V.B. Deshmukh, Advocate for the sole
respondent
CORAM :SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, J.
DATE:18th NOVEMBER, 2021
PER COURT:
1Learned Advocate Mr. P.K. Deshmukh holding for learned
Advocate Mr. B.R. Sontakke Patil submits that due to the personal difficulty of
Mr. Patil he is unable to appear. On the last occasion, that is, on 12.10.2021
Mr. Patil had not even appeared and, therefore, this Court specifically
observed that if nobody appears on behalf of the applicants on the next date
the application is liable to be disposed of. Personal difficulty of the Advocate
2
CA_3824_2020
cannot be taken into consideration. Further, he had remedy to apply for
leave. He has not done that. In fact, no reasonable ground is shown to
adjourn the matter. Under such circumstance, the application stands
dismissed in default.
( Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi, J. )
agd
WAJID KHUDDUS KAZI
ABDUL RAUF BANEMIYA KAZI
VIBHA KANKANWADI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court