Anil Fondu Naik Gaonkar., Vs State of Goa, Thr. Its Chief Secretary and 3 Ors.

Heard Rohit Bras De Sa, learned Counsel for the Appellant, Mr. Deep D. Shirodkar, learned Additional Government Advocate for the Respondent No.1 and Mr. S. P. Munj, learned Additional Government Advocate for the Respondent No.3.

¶17

2 22-Ao-63-2019 w ca-214-2019 in ao-63-2019

¶18

Admit.

¶19

It is made clear that the pendency of this appeal shall not be a bar for the trial court to proceed with the suit. In fact, the trial court should proceed with the suit and endeavour to dispose of the same on merits without in any manner being influenced by the impugned order or the fact that this appeal is pending.

¶20

The Civil Application seeking interim reliefs is disposed of since, by the impugned order interim relief was declined by the appellant and, further, it is not as if any ad-interim order was operating during the pendency of the application for interim relief before the trial court.

¶21

M. S. SONAK, J.

¶22

msr.

Anil Fondu Naik Gaonkar., v. State of Goa, Thr. Its Chief Secretary and 3 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anil Fondu Naik Gaonkar., v. State of Goa, Thr. Its Chief Secretary and 3 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Amol Sawant., Vs the Public Information Officer.

Amelino Clifton De Rosario Azavedo and Anr., Vs Newton Azavedo and 3 Ors.

Mahesh S. Raikar Vs the Administrator of Devalayas and the Mamlatdar of Ponda and 9 Ors.

Ashwin Holdings Pvt. Ltd., Thr. Its Aut. Rep., Ranjit Kumar Chowdhury., Vs Anthony Fernandes, Thr. His Poa, Rosa Conceicao Fernandes and 6 Ors.

Bhanudas Prabhakar Morajkar and 7 Ors. Vs Eknath Prabhakar Morajkar and 3 Ors.

Chaya Shaba Naik @ Chaya Vijay Shirodkar Vs Vijay Nanu Shirodkar