The High Court at Aurangabad disposed of a civil application by the applicants, who alleged creation of third-party interest by respondents despite an order prohibiting such acts. The court held the remedy for violation lies elsewhere and is not within the present application.
The civil application stands disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
32 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.13221 OF 2019
IN SA/14/2013
ASHA MANOHAR DANSURE AND ORS
VERSUS
KAMALBAI MADHUKAR DANE AND ORS
Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Sant Kishor C. Advocate for Respondents No.1,2-a, 2-b, 3 : Mr. A. G.
Godhamgaonkar
Advocate for Respondents No.6, 7: Mr. V. S. Kakde h/f Mr. S. D.
Tawshikar
R/5 Deleted.
CORAM : SMT.VIBHA KANKANWADI, J. DATE : 15-11-2021.
ORDER :
2
CA 13221-2019
hearing and final disposal of the second appeal. 3. It is expected that parties would not deal with, transfer or create any charge, or third party interest whatsoever over the suit property.
(SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI) JUDGE
vjg/-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a separate application is maintainable to remedy alleged violation of an order directing parties not to create third party interest over suit property.
Whether the remedy for violation of a court order lies within the current application or elsewhere.
Vibha Kankanwadi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
