Disposed

Mohammaed Hameedullah Khan S/O Mohammed Sadullah Khan Died Thr Lrs Irfan Ullah Khan Died Lrs Tahsee v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Bombay HC29 Sept 2021CA/131/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court, Bombay Bench at Aurangabad disposed of three civil applications filed in a contempt petition. The judge authorized specific applicants to receive funds on behalf of other applicants, allowing their prayers. The main contempt petition was dismissed as no amount remained after deposit, leading to the disposal of dependent applications.

What did the court decide?

Applicants authorized to receive authorized amounts; Contempt Petition disposed of due to full deposit; dependent applications dismissed.

Mohammaed Hameedullah Khan S/O Mohammed Sadullah Khan Died Thr Lrs Irfan Ullah Khan Died Lrs Tahsee Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr. — Bombay HC (2021) — LawSathi Research

¶1

49-ca.8510-21.odt

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶3

CIVIL APPLICATION NO.8510 OF 2021 IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO.636 OF 2019 (Mohd. Hameedullah Khan, died, through L.Rs. Irfan Ullah Khan, died, through L.Rs. Tahseen Sultan and ors.

¶4

Vs.

¶5

State of Maharashtra)

¶6

Mr.G.S.Patil, Advocate for applicants Mr.A.M.Phule, AGP for respondent

¶7

CORAM : R.G. AVACHAT, J. DATE : SEPTEMBER 29, 2021

¶8

ORDER :-

¶9

Heard. Perused the application.

¶10

The applicant – Tahseen Sultana is authorised to receive

¶11

the amount for and on behalf of applicant nos.1A, 1B, 1C and 5A to 5D. In view of the same, the application is allowed in terms of prayer

clause (B).

KBP

49-ca.8510-21

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶16

CIVIL APPLICATION NO.9443 OF 2021 IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO.636 OF 2019 (Mohd. Hameedullah Khan, died, through L.Rs. Irfan Ullah Khan, died, through L.Rs. Tahseen Sultan and ors. Vs.

¶17

State of Maharashtra)

¶18

Mr.G.S.Patil, Advocate for applicants Mr.A.M.Phule, AGP for respondent

¶19

CORAM : R.G. AVACHAT, J. DATE : SEPTEMBER 29, 2021

¶20

ORDER :-

¶21

Heard. Perused the application.

¶22

The applicant – Atiqullah Khan is authorised to receive

¶23

the amount for and on behalf of applicant nos.2, 3 and 6. In view of the same, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (B).

[ R.G. AVACHAT, J. ]

KBP

49-ca.8510-21

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶28

CIVIL APPLICATION NO.9444 OF 2021 IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO.636 OF 2019 (Mohd. Hameedullah Khan, died, through L.Rs. Irfan Ullah Khan, died, through L.Rs. Tahseen Sultan and ors.

¶29

Vs.

¶30

State of Maharashtra)

¶31

Mr.G.S.Patil, Advocate for applicants Mr.A.M.Phule, AGP for respondent

¶32

CORAM : R.G. AVACHAT, J. DATE : SEPTEMBER 29, 2021

¶33

ORDER :-

¶34

Heard. Perused the application.

¶35

The applicant – Rafat Sultana is authorised to receive

¶36

the amount for and on behalf of applicant nos.4A, 4B and 4C to 4D. In view of the same, the application is allowed in terms of prayer

clause (B).

[ R.G. AVACHAT, J. ]

KBP

49-ca.8510-21

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶42

CONTEMPT PETITION NO.636 OF 2019

¶43

Mohd. Hameedullah Khan, died, through L.Rs. Irfan Ullah Khan, died, through L.Rs. Tahseen Sultan and ors.

..Petitioners

Vs.

State of Maharashtra

..Respondents

Mr.G.S.Patil, Advocate for petitioners Mr.A.M.Phule, AGP for respondent

¶49

CORAM : R.G. AVACHAT, J. DATE : SEPTEMBER 29, 2021

¶50

ORDER :-

¶51

Heard.

¶52

Since the entire amount under the impugned award has

¶53

been deposited, nothing survives in the Contempt Petition. The Contempt Petition, therefore, stands disposed of.

[ R.G. AVACHAT, J. ]

KBP

49-ca.8510-21

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶58

CIVIL APPLICATION NO.131 OF 2020 IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO.636 OF 2019

¶59

Mohd. Hameedullah Khan, died, through L.Rs. Irfan Ullah Khan, died, through L.Rs. Tahseen Sultan and ors.

¶60

..Applicants

¶61

Vs.

¶62

State of Maharashtra ..Respondents

¶63

Mr.G.S.Patil, Advocate for applicant Mr.A.M.Phule, AGP for respondent

¶64

CORAM : R.G. AVACHAT, J. DATE : SEPTEMBER 29, 2021 ORDER :-

¶65

In view of disposal of the Contempt Petition, this Civil

¶66

Application does not survive and stands disposed of.

¶67

KBP

Mohammaed Hameedullah Khan S/O Mohammed Sadullah Khan Died Thr Lrs Irfan Ullah Khan Died Lrs Tahsee v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohammaed Hameedullah Khan S/O Mohammed Sadullah Khan Died Thr Lrs Irfan Ullah Khan Died Lrs Tahsee v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Parvatabai Shravan Sirsath Vs the State of Maharashtra, through, the Special Land Acquisition Officer, Aurangabad and Another

Kisan Shripat Sirsath and Another Vs the State of Maharashtra, through, the Special Land Acquisition Officer, Aurangabad and Another

Manohar Eknath Sirsath Vs the State of Maharashtra through the Special Land Acquisition Officer, Aurangabad and Another

Dashrath Sadashiv Shakkarge (Died) by Lrs Tejarao and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Th. Div Manager Vs Pushpa Rajendra Nimbalkar and Ors.

Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division, Osmanabad Vs Uttreshwar Khandu Nangare and Anr.