Allowed

Ahomo Efe Helen and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC21 Oct 2021BA/975/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court granted bail to the applicants in a criminal appeal involving multiple offences including violation of Passport and Foreigners Acts. Bail was granted on furnishing a bond and with specific conditions regarding witness influence and attendance.

What did the court decide?

Applicants released on bail upon furnishing a P.R. bond of Rs. 50,000/- each with sureties, subject to conditions including non-interference with witnesses and attending police stations.

Ahomo Efe Helen and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra — Bail and Remand | Bombay HC (2021)

¶1

23.975.21 BA.doc

¶2

ISM

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 975 OF 2021

¶5

AHOMO EFE HELEN AND ANR

¶6

….APPLICANTS

¶7

V/s.

¶8

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

¶9

…..RESPONDENT

¶10

Mr. Yashpal Thakur advocate for the Applicants Mrs. Rutuja Ambekar APP for the State Ms. Manisha Jagtap for E.D.

¶11

CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE, J. DATE: 21^st OCTOBER, 2021.

¶12

P.C.:

¶13

1] Applicants are seeking bail in C.R. No. 385/2020 registered with Vashi Police Station for offence punishable under Sections 188, 269, 270 r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 3 of The Epidemic Diseases Act, Section 12 of The Passports Act, 1967, Section 14(a) of The Foreigners Act and Section 65(e) of Maharashtra Prohibition Act. Applicants were arrested on 05/12/2020 and charge-sheeted on 08/02/2021.

¶14

1/3

¶15

23.975.21 BA.doc

¶16

2] Case of the prosecution is, applicant overstayed in the receiving country i.e. India without valid Visa.

¶17

3] I am informed that co-accused is already ordered to be released

¶18

on regular bail in this crime by an order of Magistrate dated 28/07/2021.

¶19

4] This Court on last occasion, having regard to the Judgment of the Goa Bench in the matter of Suo Motu Petition No. 1 of 2019 has called upon the Chief Secretary of State of Maharashtra so also counsel for Union of India to submit its response/compliance in view of directions issued in the aforesaid judgment.

¶20

5] Counsel for Union of India informs that framing of policy is under process in view of the aforesaid Judgment and relevant statistics are being collected. It is further informed that same is likely to take sometime.

¶21

6] In the aforesaid background and having regard to the fact that

¶22

2/3

¶23

23.975.21 BA.doc

¶24

other co-accused is already ordered to be released on bail, in my opinion, applicant also deserves similar relief.

¶25

(i) Applicants be released on bail in C.R. No. 385/2020 registered with Vashi Police Station for offence punishable under Sections 188, 269, 270 r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 3 of The Epidemic Diseases Act, Section 12 of The Passports Act, 1967, Section 14(a) of The Foreigners Act and Section 65(e) of Maharashtra Prohibition Act, upon furnishing P.R. bond in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- each with one or more local sureties in the like amount.

¶26

(ii) Applicants shall neither influence the prosecution witnesses in any manner nor tamper with the evidence.

¶27

(iii) Applicants shall attend the concerned police station on every third day till appropriate Visa is issued to the applicants.

¶28

(iv) Applicants shall not leave India without prior permission of the Court below.

¶29

7] Application stands disposed of.

¶30

[NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.]

¶31

3/3

Ahomo Efe Helen and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ahomo Efe Helen and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rahul Rajindranath Khanna and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra

Wasim Mohammed Yunus Shaikh Vs the State of Maharashtra

Mohammed Suleman Farooqui Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Sande Joseph Chukavu Vs the State of Maharashtra

Mumtaz Alam Anwrali Shaikh Vs the State of Maharashtra

Farida Liyakat Shaikh Vs the State of Maharashtra