Dismissed
Mohan Tukaram Kamble v. the State of Maharashtra
Bombay HCBA/85/2020
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
: 1 :
4.BA-85-20.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.85 OF 2020
Mohan Tukaram Kamble ….. Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra.... Respondent
None present for the Applicant.
Mr. Ameet A. Palkar, APP for the Respondent-State.
CORAM :SARANG V. KOTWAL, J. DATE : 17th JULY, 2021 [Through Video Conferencing]
P.C. :
1. Nobody appears for the applicant. This board
was published well in advance. Option was given to learned
Counsel for the applicant to inform the Registry, if he was
not available. No such intimation is given. No one appears
for the applicant. Therefore, the application is dismissed for
default.
(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)
Deshmane (PS)
1 of 1
Mohan Tukaram Kamble
The State of Maharashtra
SARANG V. KOTWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court