Single judge rejected bail application for applicant with 26 antecedents and life imprisonment charge, noting no case made out despite externment history.
Bail application rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Dusane
1/1
54 BA 637.21.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BHALCHANDRA GOPAL DUSANE
BAIL APPLICATION NO.637 OF 2021
Digitally signed by BHALCHANDRA GOPAL DUSANE Date: 2021.10.12 20:38:36 +0530
Akram Sardarali Shaikh @ Akku....Applicant
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra ....
Respondent
Mr. Viral Rathod i/by Mr. A.A. Sothe for Applicant.
Mrs. J.S. Lohokare, APP for State of Maharashtra.
Mr. Rupesh N., PSI, Powai Police Station.
Coram : NITIN W. SAMBRE, J. Date : 12TH OCTOBER, 2021
P.C.:
1. There are already 26 antecedents against the accused and
the applicant was already subjected to externment. The role attributed
to the applicant appears to be serious, which is punishable with life
imprisonment.
2.No case is made out. The application stands rejected.
( NITIN W. SAMBRE, J. )
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the applicant who has 26 antecedents and faces a charge punishable with life imprisonment.
Whether the role attributed to the applicant justifies rejection of the bail application.
Bhalchandra Gopal Dusane
The State of Maharashtra
Nitin W. Sambre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court