Shahrukh Anwar Shaikh v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court of Bombay disposed of a criminal bail application as infructuous because the applicant was acquitted after the trial was concluded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
32.BA-569-21.odt
: 1 :
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.569 OF 2021
Shahrukh Anwar Shaikh ….. Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra.... Respondent
Mr. Vikas B. Shivarkar, Advocate for the Applicant.
Smt. J.S. Lohokare, APP for the Respondent-State.
CORAM :SARANG V. KOTWAL, J. DATE : 25th JUNE, 2021 [Through Video Conferencing]
P.C. :
1. Learned counsel for the applicant states that this
matter has become infructuous because the trial is already
over and the applicant is acquitted. The statement is
accepted. Therefore, the application is disposed of as having
rendered infructuous.
(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)
Deshmane (PS)
1 of 1
Shahrukh Anwar Shaikh
The State of Maharashtra
Sarang V. Kotwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court