The criminal bail application was allowed to be withdrawn as it was not pressed by the applicant's counsel. The High Court directed the trial court to conclude the trial within a period of two months as the main evidence was already recorded.
Application allowed to be withdrawn; tria l directed to conclude within two months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
: 1 : 22-ba-427-20.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 427 OF 2020
Jakir Bandenawaj Mulla
Versus
The State of Maharashtra
.... Applicant
.... Respondent
Mr. Jay S. Patil i/b. Viresh V. Purwant for Applicant.
Mr. S. H. Yadav, APP for State/Respondent.
CORAM:SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.
DATE:15th FEBRUARY, 2021
P.C. :
1.The applicant is seeking his release on bail in
connection with C.R.No.1008 of 2019 registered with Faujdar
Chavdi police station, Solapur, under sections 376(2)(1), 376(2)
(j), 376(2)(n), 366 and 506 of IPC.
2.At the outset, learned APP, on the basis of report given
by the investigating officer to the public prosecutor’s office, states
that the Sessions Case No.292 of 2019 pending before the
competent court at Solapur has progressed, the evidence of victim
and her mother is already recorded and the trial is nearing its
1 of 2
Gokhale
: 2 : 22-ba-427-20.odt
conclusion. In the backdrop of this statement, learned counsel for
the applicant does not press this application, but prays for
directions to the trial court to complete the trial expeditiously.
3.Considering this request, the application is allowed to
be withdrawn as ‘not pressed’.
4.Since the main evidence is already recorded, the trial
court is directed to conclude the trial within a period of two
months from today.
5.With this direction, the application is disposed of.
(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)
2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to grant relief on the merit of the bail application when it was not pressed.
Whether to direct the trial court to conclude the trial expeditiously given that evidence has been recorded.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Jakir Bandenawaj Mulla
The State of Maharashtra
SARANG V. KOTWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court