Disposed

Anklesh Govind Rathod v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC29 Sept 2021BA/3008/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single-Judge High Court granted leave to withdraw successive bail application and directed trial court to conclude trial of Sessions Case No.132 of 2017 within six months due to delay.

What did the court decide?

Leave to withdraw bail application with liberty to file fresh application before Trial Court pending conclusion of trial within six months; Trial Court directed to conclude trial within six months.

Anklesh Govind Rathod Vs the State of Maharashtra — Bail and Remand | Bombay HC (2021)

¶1

ssm 1 36-ba3008.21.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶3

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3008 OF 2021

¶5

Anklesh Govind Rathod…..Applicant

¶6

Vs.

¶7

The State Of Maharashtra…..Respondent

¶8

Mr. Manoj Tiwari for the Applicant.
Smt. Veera Shinde APP, for the Respondent-State.
Mr. Ghadge, PSI, Kandiwali Police Station.

¶9

CORAM : A. S. GADKARI, J.
 DATE : 29th SEPTEMBER, 2021.

¶10

P.C.:-

¶11

This is a successive Application for Bail.

¶12

2Smt. Shinde, learned APP on instructions from the concerned
Investigating Officer submitted that, the Trial Court has now scheduled the
trial for framing of charge on 5th October, 2021. The charge-sheet indicates
that, the prosecution is intending to examine in all 8 witnesses, out of
which 4 witnesses are Police personnel.

¶13

The APP on instructions, further submitted that, it may take
about 6 months time to conclude the trial of the present case i.e. Sessions
Case No.132 of 2017 pending on the file of learned Additional Sessions
Judge, Borivali Division, Dindoshi, Mumbai.

¶14

1/2

¶15

ssm 2 36-ba3008.21.doc

¶16

3In view thereof, the learned Advocate for the Applicant seeks
leave to withdraw the present Application with liberty to file a fresh
Application for bail before the Trial Court, if the trial arising out of Sessions
Case No.132 of 2017 (CR No.15 of 2017, registered with Kandivali Police
Station, Mumbai) does not conclude within a period of 6 months from
today.

¶17

Leave and liberty granted.

¶18

4 Bail Application is accordingly disposed off, as withdrawn.

¶19

5As the Applicant is behind the bar since last about 4 years, the
Additional Sessions Judge, Borivali Division, Dindoshi, Mumbai seized of
Sessions Case No.132 of 2017 (CR No.15 of 2017, registered with Kandivali
Police Station, Mumbai), is directed to conclude the trial of the said case
within a period of 6 months from today.

¶20

 (A.S. GADKARI, J.)

¶21

Digitally signed by SANJIV SANJIV SHARNAPPA SHARNAPPA MASHALKAR MASHALKAR Date: 2021.10.04 14:25:19 +0530

¶22

2/2

Anklesh Govind Rathod v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anklesh Govind Rathod v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Faiyaz Abdul Munir Khan Vs the State of Maharashtra

Mr. Kuldeep Meghraj Shewad and Ors. Vs M/S. V.V. Phuge Pramotor and Builder Private Limited the. Director Mr. Vija Vishnu Phuge and Ors.

Mr. Kuldeep Meghraj Shewad and Ors. Vs M/S. V.V. Phuge Pramotor and Builder Private Limited the. Director Mr. Vija Vishnu Phuge and Ors.

Shri Waman Bhagoji Buravane Vs Mrs. Latabai Bhaskar Deshmukh

Shehnaz Sani and Anr. Vs Bobby Suresh Shah and Anr.

Chimanlal K. Mehta Vs Anjan Devi Prasad Kejriwal