Allowed

Supriya Hruday Sakpal @ Supriya Rahul Kharat v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC1 Oct 2021BA/2905/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay granted bail to an applicant charged with forgery and breach of trust under sections 408, 465, 468, 471 and 34 of the IPC, noting that the handwriting expert's opinion was awaited but the investigation was completed.

What did the court decide?

Applicant released on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 15,000 with one or more sureties; six weeks indulgence granted to furnish sureties.

Supriya Hruday Sakpal @ Supriya Rahul Kharat Vs the… — Cheating and Forgery | Bombay HC (2021)

¶1

BA-2905-21.doc

¶2

BDP-SPS-TAC

¶3

BHARAT DASHARATH PANDIT Digitally signedby BHARATDASHARATHPANDIT Date: 2021.10.0113:00:19 +0530

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.2905 OF 2021

¶5

Mrs. Supriya Hruday Sakpal
@ Supriya Rahul Kharat

¶6

….Applicant.

¶7

V/s

¶8

The State of Maharashtra

¶9

…..Respondent

¶10

Mr. Kuldeep S. Patil i/b Ms. Saili N Dhuru for the Applicant.
Mr. Swapnil S. Pednekar, APP for the Respondent/State.

¶11

CORAM: NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.

¶12

DATE: OCTOBER 01, 2021

¶13

P.C.:-

¶14

1]Applicant is seeking regular bail in Crime No. 03/2020
registered with N.M. Joshi Marg Police Station on 2/1/2020 for the

¶15

offence punishable under sections 408, 465, 468, 471 and 34 of the

¶16

Indian Penal Code. Applicant was arrested on 3/8/2021.

¶17

2]Prosecution case against the Applicant is, while working as an
Accountant with co-accused, Damodar who has already expired on
19/8/2020, forged signature and has withdrawn amount from the

¶18

1/3

¶19

BA-2905-21.doc

¶20

Account of the Flat Owners Association to the tune of Rs 10 lakhs.

¶21

3]The learned APP has opposed the prayer for grant of bail based
on the evidence available on record.

¶22

4]Fact remains that opinion of an handwriting expert is still
awaited. There are no criminal antecedents and investigation in the
matter is already over.

¶23

5] In that view of the matter Applicant be released on bail in Crime No. 03 registered with N.M. Joshi Marg Police Station for the offence punishable under sections 408, 465, 468, 471 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code on furnishing P.R. Bond in the Sum of Rs 15,000/- with one or more sureties in the like amount. Applicant shall neither influence the prosecution witnesses in any manner nor tamper with the evidence.

¶24

6] By way of an indulgence, time of six weeks is granted to furnish

¶25

surety with an understanding that no further extension for the same will

¶26

2/3

¶27

BA-2905-21.doc

¶28

be granted.

¶29

7] In view of above, Applicant shall be till then be temporarily released on cash bail.

¶30

(NITIN W. SAMBRE, J. )

¶31

3/3

Supriya Hruday Sakpal @ Supriya Rahul Kharat v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Supriya Hruday Sakpal @ Supriya Rahul Kharat v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Abdul Kalam Abdul Salam Khan Vs the State of Maharashtra

Ravi Prakash Shetty Vs the State of Maharashtra

Firoz Afsar Khan Vs the State of Maharashtra

Moin @ Moinuddin Shaifq Shaikh Vs the State of Maharashtra

Touseaf Yakub Ansari Vs the State of Maharashtra

Sanjay Randir Dulgach Vs the State of Maharashtra