Salim Aslam Sayyed v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
DDR IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DDR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO. 231 OF 2020
SALIM ASLAM SAYYED ..APPLICANT VS. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ..RESPONDENT
None for the applicant. Mr. N.B. Patil, APP for the State.
CORAM : M.S.KARNIK, J.
DATE : AUGUST 2, 2021
P.C.:-
The matter was called out in the morning session. None appeared on behalf of the applicant even in the second session. There is no appearance on behalf of the applicant on the last date. It appears that the applicant is not interested in prosecuting the application. The application is dismissed for non prosecution.
Digitally signed DIKSHA by DIKSHADINESH RANE DINESH Date: RANE 2021.08.0217:44:33 +0530
1/1
SALIM ASLAM SAYYED
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
M.S. KARNIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court