Allowed

Ankush Shivaji Suryawanshi v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC22 Dec 2021BA/1508/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Aurangabad granted bail to the applicant accused under Sections 498-A, 306, 323, 504, and 506 of IPC. The court allowed the bail application after noting that a substantial part of the investigation was complete and imposed strict conditions on the accused.

What did the court decide?

Applicant released on personal recognizance of Rs.50,000 with two solvent sureties of Rs.25,000 each on stringent conditions including non-entry into Parli Vaijinath jurisdiction.

Ankush Shivaji Suryawanshi Vs the State of Maharashtra — Matrimonial and Divorce | Bombay HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶2

1020 BAIL APPLICATION NO.1508 OF 2021

¶3

WITH

¶4

APPLN/3239/2021 IN BA/1508/2021

¶5

ANKUSH SHIVAJI SURYAWANSHI

¶6

VERSUS

¶7

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

¶8

Mr. A.V. Lavte, Advocate for the applicant

¶9

Mr. N.T. Bhagat, APP for the respondent/State Mr. A.N. Nagargoje, Advocate for assist to APP

¶10

CORAM : SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, J. DATE : 22^th DECEMBER, 2021

¶11

PER COURT :

¶12

1 Criminal Application No.3239 of 2021 moved for assist to APP stands allowed and disposed of.

¶13

2 Present bail application has been filed under Section 439 of the

¶14

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 by the applicant-husband, who has been arrested in connection with Crime No.277/2021 by Vedant Nagar Police Station, Dist. Aurangabad for the offence punishable under Section 498-A,

¶15

¶16

BA_1508_2021

¶17

306, 323, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

¶18

3 Heard learned Advocate Mr. A.V. Lavte for the applicant and learned APP Mr. N.T. Bhagat for the respondent.

¶19

4 Perusal of the First Information Report lodged by one Usha Vikram Suryawanshi would show that she is the mother of deceased Meghna, who was the wife of present applicant. Present applicant and Meghna got married on 16.02.2021. It is then stated in the First Information Report that Meghna was asking present applicant to take her along with him to Aurangabad, but he asked her to continue her stay at his parental house Kitti Aadgaon. It is also then stated that after residing there for about one and half months Meghna went to reside with her mother and she used to make phone call to the applicant for taking her along with him to Aurangabad, which he did not do. Informant further says that thereafter she left Meghna to her matrimonial home on 08.06.2021. It was informed by the mother of the present applicant to Meghna and informant that she had been to Aurangabad where she had seen the room of present applicant situated in Padampura area of Aurangabad and then Meghna went to reside in that room along with the present applicant on 11.06.2021. She also got employment in a company at Aurangabad. Informant then says that deceased used to convey to her that the present applicant is harassing her financially and also mentally

¶20

3 BA_1508_2021

¶21

as he was not properly behaving with her. Meghna could see that present applicant had some love affair with another girl and was asking Meghna to take divorce. Thereafter there used to be quarrel between them. It is also stated that the applicant had harassed her by demanding amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and the articles. Informant then says that Meghna committed suicide by hanging on 21.10.2021.

¶22

5 Substantial part of the investigation appears to be over. Statements of witnesses have been recorded. Nothing is required to be recovered from the applicant. Though the offence is anti social and serious, when substantial part of the investigation is over, by imposing stringent conditions the application deserves to be allowed. Hence, following order.

¶23

ORDER

¶24

1 Application stands allowed.

¶25

2 Applicant viz. Ankush Shivaji Suryawanshi, who has been arrested in connection with Crime No.277/2021 by Vedant Nagar Police Station, Dist. Aurangabad for the offence punishable under Section 498-A, 306, 323, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, be released on P.R. of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) with two solvent sureties of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each.

¶26

4 BA_1508_2021

¶27

3 The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence of the

¶28

prosecution, in any manner.

¶29

4 He shall not indulge in any criminal activity.

¶30

5 If he commits any breach of above terms of bail, the prosecution

¶31

is at liberty to move the Trial Court under Section 439(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure for cancellation of bail.

¶32

6 He shall not enter the jurisdiction of Parli Vaijinath, Tq. Parli, Dist. Beed till the conclusion of trial. Before submission of bail papers, the applicant should give his mobile number to the Investigation as well as to the Trial Court. So also he should comply with the requirements under paragraph Nos.12 (1) to (6) of Chapter I of Criminal Manual, (whichever are applicable).

¶33

7 Bail before Trial Court.

¶34

8 Criminal Application No.3239 of 2021 stands disposed of.

¶35

( Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi, J. )

¶36

agd

Ankush Shivaji Suryawanshi v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ankush Shivaji Suryawanshi v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anil Chandu Ghansawant Vs the State of Maharashtra

Murshid Akhtar Ansari Vs the State of Maharashtra

Furkan Shakil Shaikh Vs the State of Maharashtra

Usha W/O. Vikram Suryawanshi Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Arun Sitaram Satre Vs the State of Maharashtra

Vishal Vitthalrao Nayak Vs the State of Maharashtra