Dismissed

Ranaram Khumaram Purohit Alias Naresh Alias Ranvir v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC26 Oct 2021BA/1310/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court rejected a bail application filed by the applicant in connection with crimes under the IPC and Arms Act. The applicant was unable to furnish local sureties as directed, remained absent on temporary cash bail on four occasions, and was executed on a non-bailable warrant. The court held that no case for bail was made out.

What did the court decide?

The bail application was rejected, and the interim application stands disposed of.

Ranaram Khumaram Purohit Alias Naresh Alias Ranvir Vs the… — Bail and Remand | Bombay HC (2021)

¶1

(33)-BA-1310-21.doc .

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.1310 OF 2021
WITH

¶4

INTERIM APPLICATION (STAMP) NO.16475 OF 2021

¶5

Ranaram Khumaram Purohit
alias Naresh alias Ranvir ..Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent

¶6

Mr. H. R. Sharma i/by Mr. Dinesh P. Guchiya, Advocate for the
Applicant.

¶7

Mr. Mehul A. Rathod – Intervenor.
Ms. A. A. Takalkar, APP for the Respondent – State.
Mr. Jayadip Jadhav, API, DCB- CID-V – present.

¶8

CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.

¶9

 DATE : 26th OCTOBER, 2021

¶10

P.C.

¶11

The applicant was directed to be released by the
Additional Sessions Judge vide order dated 6th August, 2019 in
Crime No.44 of 2019 registered in Mahim Police Station under
Sections 394, 342, 381, 397, 452 r/w 34 of IPC and Sections 3 and
25 of the Arms Act.

¶12

2. Admittedly, till date the applicant is unable to furnish
sureties of local person as was directed.

¶13

3. Apart from above, the non-bailable warrant was issued,

¶14

BGP. 1 o f 2

¶15

(33)-BA-1310-21.doc .

¶16

as for four dates the applicant consistently remained absent though
he was temporarily released on cash bail.

¶17

4. The non-bailable warrant dated 3rd December, 2019 was
executed having noticed that the applicant was behind the bar in
Crime No.298 of 2020.

¶18

5. In the aforesaid background, an option was given to
learned counsel for the applicant as to whether he can produce the
sureties before this Court in compliance with the order dated 6th
August, 2019 directing his release. However, there is no positive
response on the said issue. The applicant is permanent resident of
Rajasthan. Other similar offence is also registered against him.

¶19

6. In the aforesaid background, no case for bail is made
out. Application as such stands rejected.

¶20

7. In view of disposal of bail application, interim
application also stands disposed of.

¶21

Digitally signed by BALAJI BALAJI GOVINDRAO GOVINDRAO PANCHAL PANCHAL Date: 2021.10.27 10:28:56 +0530

¶22

[NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.]

¶23

2 o f 2

¶24

BGP.

Ranaram Khumaram Purohit Alias Naresh Alias Ranvir v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ranaram Khumaram Purohit Alias Naresh Alias Ranvir v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bharat Khandu Patil Vs the State of Maharashtra

Indira Vitthal Pujari Vs the State of Maharashtra

Murtuza Khalil Khan Vs the State of Maharashtra

Roshan Garry Bhinder Vs the State of Maharashtra

Mayuresh Sitaram Kadam and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra

Bimlesh Santaram Jaiswal Vs the State of Maharashtra