Rahul Devram Gouterna v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail application disposed of as infructuous since the applicant had already been convicted in the trial court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
37.BA.1155.2019.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO.1155 OF 2019
Rahul Devram Gouterna
versus
The State of Maharashtra
Applicant
Respondent
Ms.Yogita Deshmukh Chitnis, Advocate, for applicant.
Mr.S.Y.Yadav, APP, for State.
CORAM :PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.
DATE :6th September 2021
PC :
Learned counsel for applicant, on instructions, submit that trial
had proceeded and the applicant has been convicted for the offences.
This application has become infructuous. In view of the submission,
the Bail Application is disposed of as infructuous.
(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.)
MST
MANISH Digitally signed byMANISH SURESH SURESHTHATTE THATTEDate: 2021.09.0714:14:25 +0530
Rahul Devram Gouterna
The State of Maharashtra
Prakash D. Naik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court