In an arbitration application, the High Court dismissed the application as withdrawn by the applicants with liberty to file other permissible proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
928-AA-17-2017.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
928 ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO.17 OF 2017
ANIL SAHEBRAO PATIL AND OTHERS
VERSUS
M/S. VICTORY HERBALS AND AROMATICS AND OTHERS
Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Santosh Pophale h/f Mr. Urgunde
Suhas P.
CORAM : AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.
DATE : 16th July, 2021
PER COURT :
.Mr. Santosh Pophale holding for Mr. Suhas, learned
counsel for the applicants seeks permission to withdraw the
application, with liberty to take appropriate proceedings otherwise
available in law.
2. The application is, therefore, dismissed as withdrawn.
3.Needless to say, that in case, there is any other remedy,
permissible in law, as per the applicants, it would be their choice, to
avail of the same if legally permissible.
(AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.)
Sameer
Anil Sahebrao Patil and Others
M/s. Victory Herbals and Aromatics and Others
Avinash G. Gharote
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court