The High Court of Judicature at Bombay dismissed a criminal application under Article 226 of the Constitution for want of prosecution as none appeared for the applicant at the hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
20.APPLN.59.2018.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.59 OF 2018
Amit vishwamitra Wadhwa
Applicant
versus
Roshan Mahesh Makhija and anotherRespondents
None present for applicant.
Mr.R.M.Pethe, APP, for State.
PSI Kailas Ingale, Crime Branch, Unit-4, Ulhas Nagar, Thane City,
present.
CORAM :PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.
DATE :27th September 2021
PC :
Vide order dated 7th September 2021 it was observed that
charge sheet has been filed against accused and the proceedings are
pending before concerned Court. At the request of advocate for
applicant, the application was adjourned. None appears for
applicant. Hence, the application is dismissed for want of
prosecution.
(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.)
MST
MANISH Digitally signed byMANISH SURESH SURESHTHATTE THATTEDate: 2021.09.2911:35:10 +0530
Amit Vishwamitra Wadhwa
Roshan Mahesh Makhija
Prakash D. Naik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court