This case involves an application for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to respondent Nos. 1 to 5. The High Court considered the report of the public prosecutor stating that the trial had commenced and found no infirmity in the impugned order.
Application for cancellation of anticipatory bail dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
10-APPLN-542-2015.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 542 OF 2015 (FOR CANCELLATION OF ANTICIPATORY BAIL)
Nazra Shahrum Shaikh ...Applicant Versus Shahroom Fakhre Alam & Ors. ...Respondents
Mr. R. D. Suryawanshi for the Applicant
Mr. P. H. Gaikwad-Patil, A.P.P for the Respondent No.6–State
CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. FRIDAY, 11th JUNE 2021 THROUGH VIDEO-CONFERENCING
P.C. :
1 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2 By this application, the applicant seeks cancellation of the anticipatory bail granted by the learned District Judge-6 and Additional Sessions Judge, Thane vide order dated 15th July 2015 to respondent Nos. 1 to 5.
3 Learned A.P.P has tendered a report of Mr. G. L. Shewale, PI (Crime), Mumbra Police Station, Thane, stating therein that the trial of the
1/2
10-APPLN-542-2015.doc
respondents-accused has already commenced and that the complainant’s evidence is over. The said report is taken on record. The allegation as against the respondent Nos. 1 to 5 i.e. the husband, mother-in-law, father-inlaw and sisters-in-law, aged 20 and 19 years, both students, is under Section 498A, 313 r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
4 Having perused the impugned order granting pre-arrest bail to the respondent Nos. 1 to 5, no infirmity can be found in the same. Even otherwise, the trial has commenced.
5 Considering the aforesaid, no ground is made out for interfering with the impugned order dated 15th July 2015. Application is accordingly dismissed.
REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail granted to respondent Nos. 1 to 5 should be cancelled.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Nazra Shahrum Shaikh
Shahroom Fakhre Alam & Ors.
Revati Mohite Dere
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
